Guest Post: A Psychological Look at Twilight

A Psychological Look at Bella and Edward in Twilight and New Moon

By Deborah M. Chan

When I read Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight Saga, I found that the more I contemplated her characters’ emotional and psychological makeup, the more I understood them, their motivations and behavior.

I confine my thoughts to Twilight and New Moon, with some citations from Eclipse, Breaking Dawn, Midnight Sun (MS online page references) and Meyer’s backstory comments at The Twilight Lexicon (TL).

Critics complain that Bella is uninteresting and flat in Twilight. But why would the narrator of her own story seemingly give us so little and be as unapproachable to readers as she is to the novel’s characters? This is partly due to a first-time author feeling her way. However, Bella herself gives us many clues about her reticence, beginning in the first chapter of Twilight. (She becomes more vibrant and three-dimensional in the subsequent books, reflecting both authorial and character growth.)

To understand Bella, we must first consider her upbringing. So we’ll first examine her parents, Charlie and Renée, acknowledging that we don’t know what shaped and formed them.

Charlie:

Bella has never had a father. She has “Charlie,” an emotionally awkward, taciturn and rather passive man outside his job of sheriff.

Charlie, 21, married Renée, 17, when she graduated high school in Forks. According to Meyer’s backstory (PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE #10, TL), Charlie was caring for and felt responsible to his sick parents. Renee, depressed and feeling trapped in gloomy Forks, stormed out one night with their infant daughter. Says Meyer, “His choice was to follow after her, but he couldn’t leave his parents, he was very dutiful about his job, and his pride was injured. …by the time [his parents] died, Renee had moved on so far it didn’t seem like there was a point to following them.” What does this tell Bella about her importance to her father?

Instead, Charlie gave up, stayed in Forks and stoically mourned, or as he says, “handled it” (NM 96). He has never gotten over Renée or remarried (T 11). During her formative years, Bella spends only one month a year with her father in Forks, a place she detests. When she turns fourteen, their visits shrink to two weeks in California at her insistence (T 3-4). As Bella’s brief time with Charlie diminishes, so does his already minimal influence in her life. Bella has affection for her father, but only a fair amount of respect. She’s likely learned some of her stoicism from him.

A father is a girl’s foundational male relationship. Critical to her development, he helps shape her feminine view of herself and her future relationships with men. All girls want to be precious to their fathers.

In Rewriting the Family Script (Revell Books), P. Roger Hillerstrom writes, “Many children grow up with phantom fathers. For them, Dad was either physically absent or emotionally unavailable. Whatever the cause of his ineffectiveness as a father, if you grew up with a passive, unavailable dad, you learned some things about this man. You learned that you could not be important enough to become the focus of his attention, at least not for long. You learned that your needs, desires, or emotions were too much for him, so he avoided them and you.

“[He] leaves an emotional void within his children—a void that can result in a chasm of distrust and insecurity that can prevent them from developing closeness in other relationships. Feelings of unworthiness and fears of abandonment or rejection can paralyze or sabotage other relationships.”

Therapist/author Norman Wright (quoted in the above book) says: “This father is often called a bystander. He is a father in word, but not often in deed. He might be in physical proximity to his daughter, but he isn’t close to her. There is…not an emotional nearness. Some daughters feel like they’re invisible to their phantom fathers. Because dad is unaware of his daughter’s inner struggles and desire for closeness, his daughter ends up feeling like an ignored shadow.”

Charlie is not demonstrative of his feelings, unless he’s upset or excited. He greets his daughter at the Seattle airport merely with “an awkward, one-armed hug” and “It’s good to see you, Bells” (T 5).

“Charlie wasn’t comfortable with expressing his emotions out loud,” notes Bella. “I inherited that from him” (T 7). This is her perception.

In Charlie’s house, Bella is roommate, housekeeper for, and caretaker of her father, who has never learned even rudimentary cooking skills (E 5-7, 70). Absorbed in his job, friends, sports and fishing, he’s uneasy with his teen daughter and never seems to desire father/daughter intimacy with her (T 213). Bella doesn’t press for more because she doesn’t expect it; she even prefers it. “One of the best things about Charlie is he doesn’t hover” (T 9). She doesn’t need him.

Bella calls Charlie by his given name and has to remember to call him Dad to his face (T 6).

Renée:

If Charlie intrudes in Bella’s life too little, Renée intrudes too much. With her dependent nature, she lacks any sense of healthy boundaries with her daughter.

First, she inappropriately triangulates Bella into her dissatisfaction with Charlie and Forks (T 1, 3, 7), to the extent that Bella knows her mother’s cruel goodbye speech to Charlie by heart, later using it on him herself so she can escape to Phoenix to protect him (T 394).

Renée, flighty, irresponsible and incompetent, zips from fad to fad, while Bella is the little adult who supervises and cares for her mother; she even makes her mother’s wedding arrangements (NM 421). When visiting Renée in Florida, Bella believes she cares for her mother better than Phil. Then she voices the rueful parent, “You have to let them go their own way eventually. You have to let them have their own life” (E 45).

Renée, concerned over Bella’s absorption with Edward, says, “You orient yourself around him without thinking about it. You’re like a…satellite, or something. I’ve never seen anything like it” (E 68). Bella has shifted orbits, not behavior; Renée is oblivious to her own relationship with her daughter.

Leaving for Forks in Twilight, Bella says, “I felt a spasm of panic as I stared at her wide, childlike eyes. How could I leave my loving, erratic, hare-brained mother to fend for herself? Of course she had Phil now, so the bills would probably get paid, there would be food in the refrigerator, gas in her car, and someone to call when she got lost, but still . . . ” (T 4). Renée half-heartedly protests Bella’s move, saying, “‘You can come home whenever you want—I’ll come right back as soon as you need me.’ But I could see the sacrifice in her eyes behind the promise” (T 4).

Renée is what Drs. Henry Cloud and John Townsend, in The Mom Factor (Zondervan), call “The China Doll Mom…unable to deal with unpleasant or stressful situations in life…or [control] herself and her environment. She is unprepared to handle the adult world, especially the mothering parts of her life. China Doll Moms often insulate themselves from conflictual feelings by getting anxious and upset.” Bella says, “Most of the time Renee was so bewildered by her own life that she didn’t notice much else” (E 66).

In Breaking Dawn, Bella mentions their reversed mother-daughter roles (BD 571); her early dream of an older brother—“Someone to take care of me, rather than the other way around” (BD 132), and Renée calling her “My little middle-aged child” (BD 18).

Children suffer the following problems with such negligent “fragile mothering.” The child pushes away needed closeness, becoming caretaker and rescuer to feel in control over inner unmanageable feelings, and to feel connected and less isolated. Cloud and Townsend write, “The problem is that caretakers usually end up giving much and receiving little of the love they really need.” The child suppresses and withdraws emotions, disconnecting from “anger, fear or sadness” inside. Depression and anxiety result from emotional isolation and fear of being unknown “for who you really are.” The child is constantly careful not to hurt others with their own intense feelings; they don’t trust feelings, operating instead “in the sphere of thought.”

Bella easily calls her mother “Mom” to her face, but refers to her as Renée when speaking of her.

Bella’s parents do love their daughter; their neglect is benign. They married and had Bella before further growth would have revealed their incompatibility. They failed to put their marriage and child first, and working to find a solution that would keep their family intact and allow them to care for Charlie’s parents. Both stayed emotionally immature and stuck in self-absorption—in their lives, jobs, and pursuits—never becoming true adults. Their hapless parenting has produced a damaged child whose emotional and relational needs elude them and harm her. They don’t truly know or understand their own daughter.

Bella is an Invisible.

Bella

Those who criticize what they consider Bella’s “passivity,” should understand Bella as Charlie and Renée’s child.

Bella has never lived in a healthy, intact two-parent family, and lacks siblings for support and companionship (she never mentions other family relations). She’s an “old soul” caretaker of parents whom she loves, but who are oblivious to the inner life and needs of their child. Only when Bella gets in trouble does she get their full attention. Otherwise, she’s on her own.

Bella must be always be strong, competent, and self-sufficient, and meet her parents’ physical and emotional needs. She knows she can rely only on herself. This “very good girl,” does what’s expected of her, and admirably so.

Although an AP student in Phoenix, shy misfit Bella sees herself as a plain and dull mediocrity (stated frequently in Twilight; BD 523). She feels deep shame over her humiliating physical clumsiness. (And might Bella’s clumsiness and consequent hurting of herself be an outward somatic manifestation of her inner life?)

She makes no mention of friends and has never been in lover or had a boyfriend. She says wryly (wistfully?), “I didn’t relate well to people my age. Maybe the truth was that I didn’t relate well to people, period. …Maybe there was a glitch in my brain” (T 11).

Raised with little religious exposure—“My own life was fairly devoid of belief” (NM 36)—Bella finds no comfort in God or a faith community that would provide connection and make her feel valued.

She is fatalistic, stoic, depressed and pessimistic. “No need to add that my being happy in Forks is an impossibility,” she says darkly; she believes she will, as usual, fail to fit in (T 7, 9).

In order to function as she must, Bella rigidly represses her feelings, unable to allow herself the luxury of freely and fully experiencing her emotional world. She dissociates from painful and negative emotions, often for another’s sake. Her few tears come only when she’s angry and she’s angry at those tears. She lies about her reactions, to protect others’ feelings and maintain privacy she needs for strength and self-control. Though intellectually mature beyond her years, she is emotionally underdeveloped and vulnerable.

Bella is driven to understand Edward’s baffling behavior in Twilight because, by necessity and habit, she is highly attuned to others moods. Mystery or withheld information threatens and deeply unsettles her. She needs to make sense of people to know how to adjust, soothe, or resolve ambiguous situations, to feel in control and therefore safe.

It shouldn’t be surprising that her “enhanced gifts” as a vampire are super self-control and powerful mental shielding which protect both her and those she loves or feels responsible for; these enhancements are merely exaggerated extensions of her lifelong role (T 307).

The idea of being precious, beautiful or lovable is foreign to Bella. Instead, as we see in both Twilight and New Moon, she’s an anxious people-pleaser who constantly apologizes, blames herself, and suffers crushing guilt when something goes wrong or people are upset, even when these things are outside her initiation or control. A “fixer,” she feels responsible for everyone and their happiness or unhappiness. Viewing herself as a burden, she tries to fly under the radar and never be a bother to anyone.

Is it any wonder Bella demonstrates a complete lack of self-worth? That, like her Phoenix landscape, her emotional life is a desert?

Bella’s isolation and loneliness are profound.

Edward

We learn in Twilight and Midnight Sun that Edward, born in 1901, grew up an only child of loving parents he barely remembers, having only vague memories of his human years [T 287, MS 141]). With his parents and then the Cullen family, he has always known supportive family love. Although he later tells Bella that he still felt a lack (M 514), he is mostly content with a congenial, fulfilling family life he prizes.

Edward and his parents were victims of the 1918 Spanish Influenza pandemic (T 341). Though Carlisle transformed the dying Edward into an involuntary vampire, Edward loves and reveres him (T 288, MS Ch. 1), perhaps because Carlisle’s act was Edward’s mother’s seeming last request (NM 39-40). After an early “typical bout of rebellious adolescence” in which Edward left and preyed on the vilest human criminals, he became depressed, despising himself as completely monstrous. He returned and remained loyal to the Cullen “vegetarian way of life” in which they try to retain “whatever essential humanity” they can (T 307, 278, 342-343).

Transformed at age seventeen, Edward was developmentally an adult. He has gained a century’s history and perspective, yet is still a teen in other ways, locked in physically and in personality, moods and preferences (MS 109). He tends to be overly analytical, overreactive, determined and stubborn, with a strong sense of moral values and justice. He believes in God yet, unlike Carlisle, considers himself a soulless monster, eternally damned, with no hope of heaven (MS Ch.1, NM 37). Despite his bleak views and struggle with self-loathing, he clings to his dreams of being something better and works hard to be so (MS 13-14).

With immortality, no mate, and endless time on his hands, Edward is brilliant, highly accomplished (MS 9, BD 485), knowledgeable, wealthy, sophisticated, intuitive, confident, wise, often arrogant, and accustomed to having most of what he wants within the limitations of his life. He tends to be dismissive toward humans, due to his mind-reading abilities, though he has studied human interaction and romantic relationships extensively through observation, books and films.

Human Edward focused on “the glory of war” and expected to be a soldier in WW I (E 277, MS 141). As human or vampire, he has never been in love. With Bella, however, he meets his romantic Waterloo. Because when it comes to love, Edward is a very prolonged case of arrested development.

Suddenly, Bella upends his peaceful and predictable existence. Unable to read her mind, and in turmoil over his growing love for her, his confidence deteriorates. He becomes insecure, obsessed, depressed and anxious (BD 26, MS 118), as he tries to repress his attraction.

Edward’s love and concern for Bella lead to some overprotective, sometimes domineering and paternalistic behavior toward her. Despite this overreaction, Edward provides Bella the emotional anchors she has missed and unknowingly yearned for all her life.

Twilight

Phoenix is colorful, hot, and dry, and Bella is a prickly cactus comfortable in her natural habitat, with her moist and tender emotions protectively hidden deep within a thick dry shell. However, once transplanted to the hostile environment of gray, cold and wet Forks, this cactus softens and blooms under the “midnight sun” of Edward’s love (MS 109). In a region where cacti must be indoor plants, she thrives.

It is difficult for Bella and Edward to be each other’s first love. Bella’s lack of self-worth would be painful and challenging with mortal love, let alone a “godlike” person of unnatural perfect beauty whom she believes can’t possibly love her (T 210). Edward, a predator held in self-check, falls for a girl he craves for dinner, with whom he must constantly control his bloodlust, yet from whom he can’t stay away. They both carry into the relationship hindering flaws and emotional baggage, and both are the type to be thoroughly committed when they meet their soul mate (T 139, E 276-277).

And, with their unique vampire/human romance, they have no script whatsoever to go by.

Though her impenetrable mental shield stymies Edward, he is, ironically, the first person to truly, intuitively see and care about the inner Bella (MS 43-44, 70). He sees behind her stoic facade a lonely, shame-filled, insecure girl starved for affection, kindness, and protection, who sacrificially carries the weight of others’ expectations. In addition to her physical safety, Edward is troubled about Bella’s unmet emotional needs. He discerns her fragility inside and out.

Edward’s care and concern unnerve the self-sufficient Bella, as this is contrary to the way she’s grown up. She struggles with feelings of inferiority, constantly comparing herself unfavorably with the Cullen beauty. (Think of Lois Lane in the 1977 film Superman, musing, “Here I am, like a kid out of school; holding hands with a god—I’m a fool.”)

Edward is the catalyst who plunges Bella into chaos and conflict regarding what she knows to be “true” about herself. Her perplexity over contradictory, mysterious Edward, with his cold/kind demeanor, dire (yet alluring) warnings, and withheld explanations provokes her need for control. She pursues answers, challenging him repeatedly and aggressively over his denials and deflections.

Edward struggles with his own chaos and conflict as, agonized, he wrestles with his base nature and a love that could endanger both them and his family (T 365-366). Bella’s interest unnerves him. Failing to overcome his attraction or drive her away, he is brought to his knees by a human girl whose persistent love forces him to question what he believes to be true about himself—he can’t overcome what he is. Their push/pull relationship gradually awakens a hope they have never allowed themselves, or believed could find fulfillment.

When Bella learns Edward is a vampire, her acceptance seems passively unreal. But she’s accustomed to accommodating major flaws and weaknesses in those she loves and can’t conceive a life without him. In each, Edward and Bella find a maturity that meets their needs. Two “old souls” click.

(Much is made of Bella’s cardiac antics during close moments with Edward. While this is a typical romance genre convention, perhaps it also symbolizes her “coming to life” after a mechanically emotionless existence.)

Edward is the complete opposite of Bella’s passive father and flighty mother—strong, certain, tender, self-sacrificial and not dependent upon her care. Watching protectively over her, he’s a comforting refuge she can rely on. No wonder Bella is utterly intrigued and smitten with him.

He respects her choices, wanting them for her, even more than he desires her, or wants her to desire him.

Bella is something Edward has never encountered—a human who isn’t repulsed by the “monster” beneath his physical beauty. Bella loves Edward lavishly and fearlessly for himself. She entrusts him with her fragility, yet equals his inner strength and determination. Easing his alienation and self-loathing, she is an unparalleled treasure for him.

Bella blooms under Edward’s love. She’s no longer an unworthy Invisible.

Edward also blooms; he finds new meaning to his life, a renewed artistic creativity, and a freer, happier spirit, which delights his family (T 326-7, 344).

In addition to romantic love, Bella finds a loving, intact family in the Cullens. Hillerstrom writes, “Many children begin a search for a replacement for the emotional closeness and trust that was lacking in Mom and Dad….”

Compared to Bella’s anemic human family, the bloodless Cullens are full of emotive, life-giving sustenance. Instead of living selfishly, they have transcended their vampiric impulses to live safely with humans, allowing Carlisle to contribute his superb medical skills to society. To enable this, Edward and his siblings have endured decades posing as high school students (T 289 MS 9) and Edward has gotten two medical degrees to keep Carlisle current (PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE #6, TL).

Through the Cullens’ affection, kindness, and concern for each other and for Bella, she observes a happy marriage and nurturing father and mother in Carlisle and Esme, and finds friends in Edward’s siblings, especially Alice. Although the Cullens don’t understand Edward and Bella’s love, with the exception of Rosalie, they accept it and warmly welcome Bella into their fold.

Twilight is a story of transcendent, mutually sacrificial love, and restoration. Bella triumphs by allowing herself to be loved and cared for, and in choosing a future with no guarantee of control. Edward triumphs by gaining self-mastery over his bestial nature, first in allowing himself tender physical affection with Bella, and then, after she’s bitten, sucking out her venom-poisoned blood without drinking further. Bella’s love restores to Edward some of his lost humanity (T 304); Edward’s love restores to Bella feelings of worth. This transcendence reflects the human/divine triumph of death and resurrection.

Bella’s decision to become a Cullen vampire is predictable, despite Edward’s opposition and the sacrifices it will require. For the first time in her life, she is truly happy. She has the hope of wholeness, and the ability to feel loved for herself alone (NM 6).

New Moon

To understand what happens to Bella in the Romeo and Juliet-based New Moon, we must first take into account what Stephenie Meyer writes on her website, www.stepheniemeyer.com, (in the New Moon section):

What if true love left you? Not some ordinary high school romance, not some random jock boyfriend, not anyone at all replaceable. True love. The real deal. Your other half, your true soul’s match… So what happens when True Love in the form of Edward Cullen leaves Bella? I can only say that we all handle grief in our own way. Bella’s way is no less valid than any other to my mind….this is the blackest period of Bella’s life.”

The book begins with Bella’s nightmare of being an old woman standing next to seventeen-year old Edward. After a joyous summer emerging from her protective cocoon, she has become increasingly anxious about turning eighteen and being older than Edward. Edward, in contrast, wants her to enjoy a long human life with him at her side, knowing he will choose not to exist once she has died (NM 19, 418).

But after her disastrous birthday party, tormented and believing he is endangering Bella’s life and soul, Edward decides she’s better off without vampires in her life (NM 512-513).

As Meyer writes, he makes “a hideous mistake in judgment.”

He leaves her.

First Edward withdraws emotionally, increasing Bella’s anxiety. Then he unexpectedly delivers an abrupt, aloof and cruel speech, targeted with razor precision to every tender, insecure area of Bella’s psyche. He coldly says he doesn’t want her and that she’s not good for him; human memories fade, so she’ll forget him. He makes her promise to avoid risks, saying, “’I’m thinking of Charlie, of course. He needs you.’” Then he disappears; the other Cullens are already gone (NM 68-71).

In a shocking, bewildering moment, Bella has lost her love, her family and her future. The butterfly with still-damp wings lies crushed in the forest.

Edward later expresses astonishment that Bella would so quickly accept this lie-filled speech without argument (NM 509-510). The reader wonders how he, who knew her so well, could be so clueless. Why wouldn’t she absolutely believe him? This is the girl who constantly apologizes for living. With very few words, he tears down her fragile new belief in herself, denigrates her sacrificial love for him, and reinforces her most deep-seated beliefs—she is not worthy of his love and her value lies in being a caretaker. In her mind, if Edward, the only person who really sees her, feels this way, she has no inner worth at all. What’s there to argue about?

(What the reader, but not Bella, discerns is that Edward’s icy speech and demeanor cloak unbearable pain, and we’re left to wonder through most of the book how he’s handling this separation.)

With Edward gone, Bella is an Invisible again. In her profound shock, loss, and grief, she experiences symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder throughout most of New Moon.

Unable to bear her agony, Bella detaches and stuffs her pain in a mental oubliette, just as she wrenches out the car stereo gift from her truck and stuffs it in a garbage bag in her closet. Her torn, bloody fingers are nothing compared to her torn, bloody spirit. Then she goes into emotional lockdown, a defensive psychological place into which she allows no one—herself, her parents, or the reader (thus the empty month chapters). She subsequently proceeds to exist in a numb zombie-like state for several months.

She carefully manages her life as a high-functioning robot—making excellent grades and being a “good girl”/perfect housekeeper (“to keep Charlie from suffering,” NM 95). She believes this will allay his concerns, but she doesn’t fool him; worried, he tells her she’s “too good.”

Every night, insomnia plagues her, along with horrific nightmares in which she relives her loss and from which she screams herself awake (NM 122). With her pain somatized, she suffers anxiety attacks and breathing problems; she feels she has a physical, gaping heart-ripped hole in her chest and wraps her arms protectively around herself at the threat of any feeling. Surprisingly, she never considers suicide.

Bella’s emotional lockdown is completely logical, a protective mechanism to tide her through a time of profound loss. For those like Bella, it’s not “better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all.” It’s better to have been “safe” than emotionally ravaged.

Adding to her trauma, Bella must struggle through it alone; she can confide in no one, including her father. Charlie offers psychiatric help, which she must refuse because she can’t tell the truth about the Cullens. To cope, she forbids herself her memories, and avoids romantic books and films.

Upon first hearing Edward’s warning voice in her head, when she approaches strangers at night in Port Angeles, Bella begins to wake up (NM 111). Cautiously emerging from her numb cocoon, Bella can no longer tightly control her painful emotions; instead, her emotions begin to rule her.

Adrift, and now angry with Edward, Bella finally begins to act like the teenager she is and has never been allowed to be. She engages in reckless behavior (NM 125) and sneaks around; she has exhilarating, forbidden fun with a motorbike; she releases her anguish through floods of tears. And she indulges in adrenaline-laced behavior, including jumping off a high cliff into the ocean, so she can hear Edward’s warning voice, even though she knows it’s only in her head (NM 112). A “real girl” replaces the “good girl.”

When Quileute acquaintance Jacob Black reaches out in simple friendship, with no dramatic shadings, Bella opens up to his sunny presence. With Jake, her only human friend, Bella can be herself, because Jacob knows about the Cullens and he doesn’t need caretaking. Jake also sees her (although differently from Edward) because “I pay attention” (NM 321). With Jake, Bella allows herself to be needy to the point of selfishness, using Jake like a healing drug to assuage her loneliness (NM 219). She becomes more dependent on him, though she knows he has growing feelings for her she can’t return.

Then Jake morphs into a conflicted werewolf, shattering their uncomplicated relationship. Bella typically wonders, “What did this say about me? It said that there was something deeply wrong with me. Why else would my life be filled with characters from horror movies? Why else would I care so much about them that it would tear big chunks right out of my chest when they went off along their mythical ways?” (NM 294).

“’We’re a pretty messed-up pair, aren’t we?’” asks Jake. “’Pathetic,’” agrees Bella. These “ruined” young people find comfort, though, in having one another (NM 349).

But Jake begins pressing Bella subtly, and then openly, for a romantic relationship. This begins another internal push/pull for Bella.

Even though she loves Jake, Bella comes very close to making her “hideous mistake” by settling for a “weak echo of what I was capable of” (NM 375). Like the “forbidden apple” in Twilight, Jake too offers her an apple—of compensatory love—which she is deeply tempted to accept because of her loneliness. But Bella has always known the truth– “[Jacob] was my best friend. I would always love him and it would never, ever be enough” (NM 219).

Meanwhile, Edward has been suffering his own misery after what was to him a painfully sacrificial breakup, and has been isolating himself from his family (NM 528). He eventually realizes he was wrong and plans to return to Bella, when he erroneously learns that she is dead by suicide (NM 514). He quickly embarks upon self-destruction in Volturra.

When Bella learns of Edward’s plan, she rushes to save him, knowing she will likely die. Back in caretaking mode, she believes Edward is acting out of guilt for motivating her death, not because he can’t live without her (NM 508); she thinks there would be “no new reason for him to want me now“(NM 432). Even when he clings to her in Volterra, and his love for her is obvious to the reader, Bella is oblivious because she still believes Edward’s parting words.

Yet when she first finds Edward, “in that instant, I felt well,” she says. “Whole. It was like there had never been any hole in my chest. I was perfect—not healed, but as if there had been no wound in the first place” (NM 452). To be with her beloved is enough.

Safely back in Forks, though, the wound’s effects still linger. Bella heartbreakingly persists in believing she is dead, or asleep and dreaming when Edward insists that he loves her, always has, and is staying; she’s convinced he’ll go away again (NM 511).

She tells Edward that death is nothing; the worst thing that can happen is that “you can leave me.” Edward, filled with anguish, begins to realize the harm he’s done her and how much he’s underestimated her human capability of love (NM 524). (Later, Jake spitefully “shows” mind-reader Edward the magnitude of Bella’s suffering, which Edward acknowledges he deserved to see [E 81-82]).

Filled with guilt and shame (NM 508), Edward vows to earn back Bella’s trust and she responds, “I don’t trust myself to be…enough. To deserve you. There’s nothing about me that could hold you” (NM 523).

Ah, the power of that breakup speech.

Bella insists that Edward not promise her anything. “If I let myself hope, and it came to nothing…that would kill me,” she tells the reader. “Where all those merciless vampires had not been able to finish me off, hope would do the job” NM 513).

People like Bella have difficulty with the idea of hope. It flies in the face of their experience, and they find indulging in it too painful, fraught as it is with disillusionment. Instead, they tread their days warily, just waiting for an ax to fall. Their low self-esteem breeds a soul-killing pessimism, making it hard for them to believe that hope and love are real, and can be theirs. And hasn’t Bella’s ax fallen? Why stick her neck out for more? Why relive her agony? Better not to hope.

Only when Bella has a stunning epiphany, realizing that she’d heard Edward’s voice in her head because she subconsciously knew he loved her, does she grasp that “He really did want me the way I wanted him—forever.” This allows her to fully believe in Edward’s love, with all doubts gone (NM 527).

Because Edward can’t bear for her to give up her humanity and refuses to transform her himself, the now-assured Bella takes charge and demands a Cullen family vote, which she wins. Edward and Bella then negotiate a pact: Edward will transform her himself (her desire) if Bella will marry him first (his desire).

With amusing irony, Bella—who has no problem with sacrificial death, eternal commitment to Edward, and becoming a vampire—understandably quails at the idea of marriage, which she has no good reason to trust. It was “the kiss of death” for her parents, and Renée has poisoned her mind about marrying young (NM 540). Nevertheless, they make a beginning toward this tenuous commitment, with which they will both struggle until they fulfill their promises.

Because of Bella’s suffering and loving sacrifices, Edward matures in important ways, with his arrogance replaced by a new humility. At the end of New Moon, after having disastrously tried to deny it to her, he accepts Bella’s choice to transform and to be one with him in every way.

And Bella joyfully knows that Edward is hers. As Meyer writes, “No matter how perfect she thinks he is, or how imperfect she thinks she is, he belongs to her. Words can’t quite capture the life-changing nature of this knowledge for Bella.”

Bella and Edward’s love, tested in the purifying fire of separation, choice, and reunion has proven pure gold.

Bella’s vampiric transformation in Breaking Dawn is no less powerful than her inner transformation throughout Twilight and New Moon. She is a confident young woman who finally believes she is worthy of love.

  1. Sue’s avatar

    Wow, I don’t know how I stumbled upon this, but SO ENJOYABLE to read!!!!! As an adult fan of the series, this piece of writing totally deconstructs the relationships in the novel in a way I have been longing to discuss and read! Bravo!

  2. revgeorge’s avatar

    Arabella, that was a very thorough look at the series through psychological lenses.

    It perhaps helps to explain why I don’t like Twilight. There’s too much psychological & emotional baggage of these two characters spilling out page after page after page after page, well, you get the picture.

    While a good story needs angst & emotionally compelling characters, Twilight is stultifyingly swimming in angst & dripping with baggage all over the place.

    So, needless to say, while your analysis is very good & very thoughtful, it doesn’t inspire me to read any farther into the Twilight series.

  3. Elizabeth’s avatar

    Fantastic post! I first started reading the books to see why so many of my adult college students (mostly women) were so entranced, and I found myself entranced. I also saw why these women identified so much with the series. Many of them are Invisibles: caretakers who have sacrificed their own lives to care for disabled or elderly family members, rather bright people who are convinced of their own stupidity, painfully shy students who don’t want to be the center of attention even when they are right. And I learned why such women (usually nursing majors, hmmmm) often gravitate to me and choose me as their mentor. Though I want to “fix” them, and give them Edwards (or at least Carlisles and Esmes) instead of the rotten men and parents they have, I can’t do that. I have become their Alice, annoyingly enthusiastic and always proud of them, trying my best to show them to their best advanatage, shoving them in front of mirrors to make them see what I see. I was encouraged to continue in my avocation and calling to teach, which sometimes I lose in a pile of grading. Thanks for some fantastic insights and verbiage in your thoughtful analysis.

  4. Lily Luna’s avatar

    Absolutely fabulous post, Arabella. Extremely interesting, well organized, and well written. It really seemed to explain how the characters act and react. I have only read Twilight and New Moon (very recently, in fact) and I did something I never do – I peeked at the last few pages of Breaking Dawn when I was buying New Moon so I knew Bella became a vampire. While I was extremely eager to read NM after finishing T, and in fact read both books in about a day each, I have not been very eager to continue with Eclipse (I read the first preview chapter included at the end of NM), probably because I need a break from the heavy emotional intensity of the two books, as revgeorge said. I also groaned at the idea (in chapter 1 of E) that Bella wanted to pursue Jake to try to help him despite Jake’s and Edward’s opposition. However, I’m sure curiosity will bring me back to the series soon.

  5. Lily Luna’s avatar

    Sorry, Deborah. I didn’t even notice you reverted to your real name instead of Arabella. :-)

  6. LibraryLily’s avatar

    Deborah, I thoroughly enjoyed reading this. Not having studied psychology with any real depth myself, it helps having someone explain its inner workings. I just knew it worked. :)

    Taking a different perspective from revgeorge, I’d say that the psychology and emotional baggage are probably a strong part of the reason I love the books. Character development is usually more interesting to me than the action in a story.

  7. Sandy Nutter’s avatar

    Hi Deborah. As a huge fan of the Twilight Saga, I enjoyed your article. It was interesting to look into the psychological aspect of the characters. I am currently writing an argumentative essay on Bella, and wondered if I could use your article as a source for my paper. Thanks for an enjoyable read, and for sharing your insight.

  8. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Wow, I’m very happy with the responses above. I plan to address them later, as we just returned from a trip.

    Also, to keep continuity within the HP/Twilight community, I’m going to be Arabella here at FHSP, using my Muggle name for any guest writing, as at HogPro.

    Sandy, I’m honored that you wish to reference my essay as a source for your paper. I simply ask that you cite it correctly and sufficently (i.e., context). Best wishes on your paper’s success!

  9. revgeorge’s avatar

    Sorry, Arabella, I had replied to your article before I read somewhere that you were going by Deborah. Now I’ve forced you back to Arabella. :(

    :)

  10. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Nah, don’t worry RevGeorge. I should have stuck with Arabella in the first place–it’s how everyone knows me and it would have been confusing with all the crossover. Thanks for the kind words above. As you are a non-Twi fan, I appreciate your reading my essay. I hope it didn’t cause any internal damage. ;-)

  11. jensenly’s avatar

    Very nice analysis Deborah/Arabella. I think you put more thought into why Bella and Edward are the way they are than Meyer did!

    I have to side with revgeorge, though. I can’t bear to read the rest of the series, as I was so turned off by Meyer’s writing. I will confess to reading the Wiki summaries of the rest of the books, as I was curious to see where the story went. And I believe it was you who commented on another blog that the MS partial manuscript written from Edward’s POV was much more interesting to read. Based on your comment, I read it and found it MUCH more enjoyable. Meyer’s writing skills have vastly improved, although I did find myself skipping sentences when Edward started describing Bella. Not nearly as bad as Bella in Twilight, though.

    Well done, kitty-lover!

  12. Saucy St. Claire’s avatar

    Despite my miniscule editorial contribution to A Psychological Look at Twilight by Arabella Figg, I continue to find tasty morsels to consume about Bella and the parental dichotomy within her life after each reading. Arabella/Deborah has insightful nuances that compel an on-the-surface-strictly-for-enjoyment reader, such as myself, to dig further into the psyche of character development. Well done, Arabella!

    I agree with LibraryLily that the main draw to the series is the emotional baggage each character brings to the train station. In the Twi-series, Meyer’s literary talents may be lacking but her plot and characters are intriguing and hit a nerve in most. I have read posts responded to by Meyer regarding her character development and she presented an in-depth analysis as to the inner workings of her characters.

    As a side note – and this I found interesting – my soon-to-be daughter-in-law is French. She came to the US as a high school exchange student over 12 years ago and completed her education with a degree in languages from Boise University. A year ago I was eager for her to read The Time Traveler’s Wife but she declined saying that despite her years in the US she found it difficult to read books written in English & confessed she loved to read but due to this difficulty she hadn’t read a book since moving here. This year we were discussing Twilight (the movie) & I offered to loan her the first book of the series. Again an uncomfortable look crossed her face but she acquiesced saying she would “give it a try.” A week later she called very excited – “I’m three-fourths of the way through the book! I can’t put it down!” She is now reading New Moon. One may deduce from the above that literary excellence is not as important as plot and characters but I suspect that’s dependent upon the reader.

  13. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Huge thanks to everyone for your most meaningful, thoughtful comments, and kind praise on my post.

    Sue, I’m happy you did find this post, and hope you keep coming here to FHSP, where John will have so much to offer in the vein (pun intended) you desire.

    RevGeorge, even if I helped you understand why you don’t like Twilight, that’s a good thing, Sta-Puft Man.

    Elizabeth, your response was very meaningful to me, because it validated my instincts about the enthusiastic embrace of these books, especially by women. We should be a society producing more Edwards; instead we’re producing far too many Bellas. Your students desperately need an Alice (and Carlisles and Esmes), and I admire and sympathize with your draining efforts to help these “Invisibles” see themselves as valuable. They will remember and revere you in gratitude the rest of their lives. To know that my post encouraged you to “keep on keeping on” made my writing it worthwhile, if nothing else did. You really touched my heart.

    Lily Luna, thanks for noting the writing! Re Eclipse, remember that Bella, because of her skewed boundaries and “saving people thing,” makes poor judgments that have consequences. Keeps it real.

    Library Lily, the emotion/psychology/character development of a story is what draws me into a story, as well.

    Jensenly, I don’t know if I put more *organizational thought* into Meyer’s characters than she did. This goes back to authorial intent. Did Meyer plot the psychological mechanics of her characters behavior? We don’t know; or if she has a strong background in psychology, what her psychological influences are, or if she writes instinctually. Whatever the case, she did masterfully write fully-realized characters who have much more to them than can be found with a surface reading.

    Thanks again!
    Arabella (and kitties who are insisting on a treat…)

  14. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Saucy St. Claire, your comment went up at the exact moment I clicked Submit on my last comment. Saucy’s editorial lookover and suggestions were invaluable (even an editor needs an editor). Merci buttercups! You doo have a gift.

    Saucy’s comments as to storytelling transcending writing quality echo what I wrote earlier over at HogPro:

    “One must differentiate storytelling ability from writing caliber. (For example, a hunter friend of ours is a born storyteller who can enthrall you with painfully ungrammatical stories.)

    Great writing “artistry” can present a dull story, or get in the way of a good one; I’ve returned plenty of those books, unfinished, to the library. Even though I’m a writer (and picky), I get impatient with writers so besotted with their prose that it (like poor writing) obscures story and distracts the reader. Yet a good pedestrian writer can spin a gripping, emotive story that isn’t restrained by less-than-stellar prose. Like our hunter friend, a good storyteller can transcend their communication skills, if you allow it.”

    So Meyer isn’t Dickens…or Jane Smiley. Future daughter-in-law’s enthusiasm over story has gotten her through one book written in English and into another, excited at her acheivement. Hooray! And she can now discuss the books and their themes with Saucy.

    (By the way, The Time Traveler’s Wife is a gem for time-travel buffs.)

  15. Karen’s avatar

    I don’t really post comments but I have to say I really loved this article. Are you , Ms. Chan, going to do E and BD as well. I would love to see it! Thank you for such a good and well thought out “guest post.”

  16. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Thank you so much, Karen! I’m sorry, but I won’t be writing more character studies here. The end of New Moon resolved Bella’s and Edward’s background-driven difficulties.

    But do please stick around for John’s substantive discussion on the books–and join in!

  17. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    But, then again, Karen, you never know! I pondered Jacob. And Leah. But it would be a while.

  18. Karen’s avatar

    Let’s hope SM writes more! (or has more dreams) I guess for now I’ll have to read “The Host” and wait for the movies. (Sigh)

  19. Michelle’s avatar

    I just finished reading Twilight and Midnight Sun, both for the first time. (I’m saving the New Moon part of your post for a “treat” after I read it.) My response to T & MS surprised me. I kept finding myself smiling or chuckling at the way they think and respond to each other. (I laughed a lot more while reading MS.)

    Your analysis spells out why I relate to Bella and Edward, even though I frequently felt just like revgeorge – the page after page bit about angst and baggage. But I have decided to go ahead and read the rest of the series, and am looking forward to it. Thanks!

  20. revgeorge’s avatar

    Michelle said, “…I have decided to go ahead and read the rest of the series, and am looking forward to it.”

    You’re much braver than me, Michelle. I salute you!! :)

  21. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Thanks, Michelle. The rest of the series is better written. I hope you enjoy the New Moon part of my esssay after you read the book.

  22. Tinuvielas’s avatar

    Hey Arabella, what a great, compelling analysis! Thanks for those insights! ?

    Late to the discussion (I am into book three of the series right now), I find it somewhat difficult to post anywhere lest I say something redundant. However, perhaps I should just comment regardless as I read along in chronological order, because otherwise I’ll end up writing a book of notes on all the different aspects you and the other HogPros (not to mention several other sites) have already mentioned…

    I guess my opinion on these novels is influenced by my European perspective – the perspective of a German mother of two in her forties with a degree in English literature and Narratology, to be precise. Thus, I’m not a native speaker and unfamiliar with US-teenage-culture, and I’m comparatively free from puritan concerns that seem so strong in the American reactions to both Harry Potter and Twilight.

    I should also say that I read the first and second volume in the series without any preconceived ideas, that is, without having read, heard or seen anything at all about the Twilight books or stories (except for the cover text, and the fact that they have created a hype). As I was reading, I jotted down some notes on those aspects in the books that intrigued me – mainly questions of genre and perspective.

    Funny enough, characterization wasn’t among the stuff that initially interested me – perhaps because I could so easily relate to both lead-characters, their feelings and actions in these two novels. Tony Heringer got it right when he wrote (at Hogshead): “Women or girls who read this aren’t stupid. They sense something about this type of writing that we don’t get.” Unlike some critics I didn’t have any issues with Bella’s reactions or with the way she behaves in the first two novels – probably because I found myself forcibly reminded of my own first, late-coming love affair (the guy wasn’t a vampire – he was Italian. Which amounts to a similar cultural difference P). In fact, I recommended “Twilight” to my husband on the grounds that imho it provides a precise picture of the inner workings of female first love – the great expectations, the idealisation of the partner as “soul-mate”, the creeping horror when you realize all is not well…, the feeling of “all or nothing”, of having lost everything worth living for when that first love-affair turns out not to work in daily life.

    I remember that time very clearly. I also remember writing in my diary (or rather, on the margin of some since-lost book) something along the lines “before I was with him, I was never without fear, but that didn’t inhibit me, because I was used to overcoming it. Now that I’m with him, I’m never afraid any more when he’s present, but I’m crippled when he’s gone”. The tragedy of living up to one’s Romantic expectations… which of course is one of the criticisms Meyers’ series has received – Bella isn’t really a good role-model, if you try to apply her undying, eternal, unconditional love to real life and real men. However, if you want to ban Romance’s influence on young girls’ (women’s?) minds, you need to ban a lot of literature (and many Hollywood films) from Jane Austen to Rebecca or Gone with the Wind…

    That said, I’d like to repeat and expand on something I wrote on another website in response to a criticism of Bella as “weak” and “willing to erase herself” (http://www.gospelandculture.org/2008/11/vampires-and-young-female-desire/) – a description perhaps not unlike your “invisible”, albeit phrased in a rather more negative fashion. While I do see the logic in your psychological treatment of the character, somehow I didn’t read Bella that way at all. On the contrary, in my book she deals with her initially stated “otherness” (her clumsiness, the fact that she’s not relating well to other teenagers, her lack of interest in “dating”, her competence in cooking or her taste in music etc.) in a wry, humorous way that I found engaging and rather mature. Now, I may be totally misreading the character due to my lack of insight and/or comprehension of American youth culture – but that was my first impression of Bella. I never thought of her as emotionally deprived or “an anxious people-pleaser”. Solitary, yes – an outsider, yes, but by choice, or perhaps “nature”, much in the vein of Frodo, or, indeed Hermione. I certainly never thought of her as “weak”, in spite of her clumsiness (and was therefore very much bothered by Edwards untoward “protectiveness” in the third book especially. I kept asking myself, why the heck does she put up with that?)

    Thus, while you are certainly, perceptively right about Bella’s psychological background, about the circumstances that made her what she is, I would argue that “the present-day” Bella we encounter in the beginning of the first novel is nonetheless a strong, self-reliant and even self-confident young woman who isn’t ashamed of or inhibited by her “otherness” at all, but who has long since learned (the hard way!?) to live with it and accept herself, even to look at herself and her shortcomings (as well as others’ shortcomings) from a certain detached, humorous, mature perspective. Remember that phrase right in the beginning: “My carry-on item was a parka”? This is someone who is utterly self-sufficient, living in the here and now, taking things the way they come – traveling life without any superfluous (emotional?) baggage, so to speak.

    My first guess was that this early maturity is probably (partly) due to the author identifying with her female character (or, as John put it, of “Twilight” being, among other things, a Mormon woman writer’s portrait of the Artist as a young woman). Upon second thought, I now think that this discrepancy between your “invisible” Bella and my “wry”, mature Bella is probably related to the other aspects I found noteworthy during my first reading of Twilight – i.e. the use of perspective/voice (more on that soon, I hope) and of Romance-conventions in a Horror/Thriller-setting.

    Because what happens in “Twilight” is that, of course, all of a sudden, “invisible”, “wry”, “mature” Bella finds herself cast in the role of Romance heroine – a role she’s rather unaccustomed to, that she needs to adapt to, but that she eventually plays enthusiastically (if with the aforementioned wry humour, itself a legacy of the Romance, if you think of Jane Austen.) Edward is first and foremost a classical hero in the by-now trashy tradition of Austen’s Darcy: superior, high class, educated, a bit dark and unfriendly and arrogant at first, initially resisting the pull of the heroine, but eventually oh, what a lover… And Bella is the accompanying female: intelligent, bookish, not interested in teenage trivia or the latest fashion stuff, a woman of sense, not sensibility just like Elisabeth Bennett, doing her own thing, dealing with her childish parents, not thinking of herself (as beautiful, or at all).

    But more than that, Bella is also a (female!) lead character in the vein of the monomyth, albeit in a Romance/Thriller genre-setting, which I think accounts for some of the admittedly annoying clichés and weaknesses she displays. However, again compare her to Frodo: Like him, Bella is an outsider-ish “small person” struggling against invading evil in a “Fantasy”-world inhabited by creatures stronger, faster and more beautiful than she is, and becoming the unwilling and decisive centre of attention. I won’t stretch the admittedly slender analogy (for instance, Bella has to do without a “wise mentor”-figure central to the monomyth), but I do think that Bella isn’t just your stock swooning Romance heroine. Nor is she (only) an emotionally starved, neglected child believing herself “unworthy of love”. Instead, she is a clever de-(or re?)construction of certain Romance traditions, transferred into the realm of the fantastical (since in real life and “serious” literature these traditions have become cliché), and combined with some convincing insights into the minds of adolescent girls (compare http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200812/twilight-vampires ). It figures, then, what a friend of mine told me about the final volume in the series (which I haven’t read yet): That Bella “really emerges as a powerful, active character. As indicated by the cover art, she’s not just a pawn on the chessboard anymore. She’s the Queen.”

  23. Tinuvielas’s avatar

    To John: The question mark above (after “insights”) was supposed to be a smiley… turned out wrong when I submitted the comment – I’d be grateful if you could edit it out. Also… any way I can get an icon, too…?

  24. Tinuvielas’s avatar

    Just read something in an old interview of JKR’s that perhaps bears on the discussion of Bella (http://www.accio-quote.org/articles/2007/0729-dateline-vieira.html). She said “I was deeply insecure, as is Hermione, I think who it’s clear, if you read the book, she’s covering up a lot of insecurities by trying to be-by trying to get good marks and so on” – solitary, an outsider; insecure, but still a strong character, precisely because of that insecurity – rather like Bella, wouldn’t you say?

  25. Tinuvielas’s avatar

    Sorry to double-post, but I should have quoted more: “I felt quite plain and I felt, you know, I definitely wasn’t the consummate popular kid– as most people aren’t after all. So that– I think that’s why people identify with Harry, Ron, and Hermione a lot because they’re– because all three of them, in some ways, are outsiders.”

  26. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Tinuvielas, thank you for such a thoughtful, long comment on my essay…and the smiley face. As I didn’t write it from a literary point of view (and am not trained for that), I’ll focus on the characterization aspects you bring up. (Actually, I wrote a long answer last night, failed to log in…and lost it! So another try.)

    I absolutely agree with you that Bella is a strong person, not weak. Actually, she is overly-strong, beyond her years, due to her upbringing. Children from dysfunctional families, as survivors, are usually stronger (though not healthier) than their peers from good homes. Bella has had to emotionally and physically take care of her parents from a very early age. That such a young person is so strong in an adult manner reflects a very skewed upbringing; such children may be world-weary little adults, but have had little to no opportunity to develop in an emotionally healthy way, and their “maturity” is flawed in many ways). Her self-contained strength does Bella no favors when she encounters feelings and situations beyond her control (and it also drives her anxieties in same.)

    Because her parents are self-absorbed and, in Renee’s case especially, dependent upon her, they do not “see” Bella–the inner Bella, their own child; therefore she is invisible to them. She’s also invisible at school in Phoenix. As a result she’s invisible to herself, not seeing her own self-worth. (However, she’s highly visible to Edward, and later Jacob, who value her enough to “see” her.)

    Because of dysfunctional family dynamics, a young person can be extraordinarily strong and (at the same time) also insecure. The insecurity doesn’t make her strong; the determination to not be subject to it, or the need to hide it through “covering up” vulnerability through habit from others, does. Such strength is often a false bravado, stemming from being hurt and a survivor, and grows as a thick, hard shell over insecurites, pain and low self-esteem. Bella’s heightened emotional awareness, need to fix, soothe, and hide her feelings of pain or fear, and feelings of unworthiness are so braided in with her strength, that both strength and insecurites/unworthiness must be broken in New Moon, so that she may transcend the brokenness to become a more healthy person. Her fatalism must be challenged so that she may experience hope for her future. Her anxieties must be dealt with so that her compulsive caretaking can be eased to a more comfortable level, where she can allow herself to fully experience (and reveal to others) her vulnerabilities.

    Bella definitely has a wry humor, but it’s often self-deprecating. She dreads public display of her clumsiness. I too find her humor engaging.

    Edward rocks Bella’s world and her solid ground of expectation that has been comfortable and understandable. And he summons an unexpected romatic love she doesn’t know how to cope with, which is unnerving. She’s no longer in charge and has lost the control which has kept her functioning so well. This is why she’s in so much conflict and has the confrontational verbal smackdowns with Edward, who takes the upper hand in the relationship, where previously it’s she who has had it in her relationships.

    You write about “the present day Bella”: “This is someone who is utterly self-sufficient, living in the here and now, taking things the way they come – traveling life without any superfluous (emotional?) baggage, so to speak.” I’m sorry, but I don’t believe any of Bella’s story or behavior supports this. She’s not as free as she thinks. Her isolation has made her profoundly lonely, she’s loaded with pain and anxieties that she stuffs down for others’ sakes, and her self-sufficiency quickly crumbles when she encounters genuine love in someone stronger than she is. When Edward leaves her, she’s self-sufficient, all right–as a self-annihilating, feeling-detatched zombie.

    I disagree that Bella being an outsider/misfit by choice or nature. Her reflections about school in Phoenix, and dismal foreboding about the possiblity of happiness in Forks shows that she hopelessly longs for it. Unfortunately, only Angela is a true friend (the others, revealed in Midnight Sun, are motivated by jealousy, desire for affiliation with the “hot” new girl, and selfish lust). Frodo was quite a social person before the Quest. And Hermione was crushed to tears by Ron’s remark in PS; frankly, I think she had been lonely her whole life for friends. Her friendship with Harry and Ron supersedes any other relationships in the books.

    I read Twilight three times and New Moon twice before writing the essay. My “aha!” moment came during my first reading of New Moon, with Bella’s plunge into self-annihilation after Edward’s leaving. If you reread the books (having had story satisfied), I think you’ll notice repeated instances of the issues I bring up, especially Bella as an “anxious people-pleaser.”

    However, I’m so appreciate of your comments, because I intend to submit my essay to the CFP: Critical Perspectives on the Twilight Saga, Edited by Maggie Parke and Natalie Wilson (see John’s Sept. 15 post, Call for Papers: Twilight Perspective). I want to tweak some parts of the essay, and perhaps I’ve not been as clear as I should be at some points, or I need further extrapolation.

    I had a family counselor (who has spent decades working with young people in youth detention and from troubled families) read my essay. He told me it was “spot-on,” and “completely in line with emotional thought and behavior.”

    But I ask others here for further input. Have I made my points clear enough to be understood? Do any of you think I’m “off” and why? Has Tineuvelas raised points I should consider? I want to make this essay the best possible before sending it to Parke and Wilson. So I covet your input. And I would love it if a psychologist who has read the books would read this essay.

    Thanks again, Tinuvielas, for your time and thoughts. I agree with you about the first love thing, as it’s certainly apt! And not just with first time love, either.

  27. Elizabeth’s avatar

    Deborah,
    I’m so happy you are submitting to the CFP! I immediately thought of this post when I saw it. Are you going to go through all four books? That might make for a huge paper, but also would prevent that unfinished feeling that comes from dealing with part of a set. Several of my students are using this post as a source on a current essay (in my ENG 113 class, they get to argue for a book to be allowed/assigned in school; Twilight is popular this year :) Thanks for being a super source! I can’t wait to see how this evolves further!

  28. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Thanks for the encouragement, Elizabeth. It’s amazing to think that your students (plural) are using my essay as source material. Submitting an essay to something like the CFP is new for me, so I’m entering Adventureland (and wasn’t Kristen Stewart in a film by that name? Heh).

    I feel that in New Moon they really resolved the psychological issues (if not all issues) that drove them but, to make sure, am rereading MS, E and BD.

  29. BabyJenks’s avatar

    thank you for this…. all of this. I was so tired of all the cheesy celebrity gossip that i was not looking for.
    As i was once both a psychology and english lit major, i deeply appreciate these insightful and adult discussions.
    Have a joyous day

  30. Arabella Figg’s avatar

    Thanks BabyJenks, for your kind words and affirmation. I’m rereading the Saga, and am pondering how I might progress this essay through Eclipse and Breaking Dawn. I just finished Eclipse–psychologically very rich–but there’s a definite focus change between NM and EC. I plan to give it a try, though.

    You’ve come to the right place to find plenty of meaty stuff here at John’s blog. Welcome!