LDS Beliefs in Twilight

You are currently browsing the archive for the LDS Beliefs in Twilight category.

In the run-up to the June release of Eclipse, the movie, a reporter from Entertainment Weekly sat down with the actor and actress who play Edward and Bella to ask a few questions. These celebrity interviews aren’t spontaneous affairs with gotcha questions meant to take the celebrities off-guard, but staged exchanges to communicate studio talking points. I was surprised, then, on reading the second question because it was pretty meaty:

EW: Some people read Breaking Dawn as very pro-life and Mormon because Bella decides to have her baby even though it’s endangering her life. Did any of that bother you when you read the book?

STEWART: No, because it made sense. Not wanting to give up the baby is about her holding onto that last thing that she would have to give up if she was not human anymore. Right after she and Edward sleep with each other for the first time, she says, “Oh, f***, I might want to be human for a little bit longer.” The baby is just an even more intense version of that.
PATTINSON:
I think people make up all these Mormon references just so they can publish Twilight articles in respectable publications like the New York Times. Even Stephenie [Meyer, author of the Twilight novels] said it doesn’t mean any of that. It is based on a dream.

After some notable screw-ups, both Ms. Stewart and Mr. Pattinson are clearly reading from Twilight franchise talking point scripts. I find their answers to the Mormon question interesting, then, for at least three reasons: Read the rest of this entry »

I’ve been getting email asking for a response to the supposed condemnation of the Twilight Saga, books, movie, and author, by the Roman Catholic Church. Let’s take a look at a few of these news stories, why Catholics might find the series both morally dissipating and offensive, and then reflect on the probability of these reports being true and what it will mean regardless of their veracity. Here is the CNN bulletin from last Friday: Read the rest of this entry »

Here’s a list in one place with links embedded for the ‘10 New Moon Notes’ Countdown this week and for the 5 Posts on Mrs. Meyer’s New Moon Q&A with readers:

New Moon Notes #10: Son Of Twilight
New Moon Notes #9: Meet Jacob Black
New Moon Notes #8: Jacob the Patriarch
New Moon Notes #7: Jacob and The Book of Mormon
New Moon Notes #6: Bella’s Hungry Heart
New Moon Notes #5: Bella’s Several Falls
New Moon Notes #4: Volturi Catholics
New Moon Notes #3: Soul-less in Seattle
New Moon Notes #2: Romeo and Juliet
New Moon Notes #1: Alchemical Nigredo

Stephenie Meyer New Moon Q&A: On Names
Stephenie Meyer New Moon Q&A: The Volturi
Stephenie Meyer New Moon Q&A: Imprinting
Stephenie Meyer New Moon Q&A: Native Americans
Stephenie Meyer New Moon Q&A: Why I write

One of the sadder points in Latter-day Saint history is a fervent anti-Papism born in the prejudices that Joseph Smith, Jr., and his first followers had against Roman Catholics. This bile is found in many early Mormon sermons and even shows in several Book of Mormon prophecies mouthed, supposedly, centuries before Christ. Mrs. Meyer is a Latter-day Saint, born and bred. There is, consequently, the strong possibility that the ancient vampires in Italy – the Volturi – whose beliefs Carlisle Cullen has resisted for a restored idea of true vampire life correspond, deliberately or unconsciously, to the Catholic tradition Joseph Smith, Jr., restored to its fullness in Mormonism. Sadly, because their name sounds like “vultures” and they are horrific monsters who kill humans for lunch, the Mormon historical prejudice seems to be shining through the story-transparency.

Wednesday! It’s time for a look at our third answer from Mrs. Meyer that she posted her at her web site in response to fan questions.

Today: Imprinting. Mrs. Meyer gives a scientific answer to how she came up with this idea. I think there are two other possibilities tied to the “elephant in the room” that she neglects. Read the rest of this entry »

Again, Mrs. Meyer has posted her answers to a host (sic) of fan questions at her web site. As promised, they are mostly about New Moon, but, sadly, they are almost all about New Moon the movie. There are some good ones, though, amidst the cinema fluff and I am posting one relatively bookish or story related question every day this week along with my ‘Top Ten Things To Know about New Moon.’

Today: The Volturi. Just as with the names, Mrs. Meyer ducks the question but tells us something interesting along the way. Read the rest of this entry »

Christianity Today’s online ‘Campus Life’ division (”Ignite Your Faith”) has posted What Shines in Twilight? Looking at Four Key Ideas of the Vampire Saga that stand out for Christ Followers, a web exclusive by Stacey Lingle. (H/T to Arabella) While aimed at connecting the dots between Twilight text and Christian life and Biblical thinking — I was reminded several times of Connie Neal’s The Gospel According to Harry Potter — it still makes several good points and avoids at least two of the usual devotional objections to the Bella Swan books. Read the rest of this entry »

John Mark Reynolds of Biola/Torrey responded to my critical review of his Scriptorium/WaPo essay, Twilight’s Flawed Faith, yesterday with this short, kind note: Read the rest of this entry »

Over at The Hog’s Head, a fight broke out about what Twilight really is in a backroom that was reserved for a much more gentile discussion. Rather than continue to break bottles and chairs there over the heads of all comers, I ran from the room and asked my friends to join me here to continue the fray. To catch up on the original, read from my post here to the end of the Hog’s Head thread and report back here for the debate in progress.

The question on the floor here is “Are the Twilight books vampire novels?” I have answered, “Not only ‘no,’ but really, ‘No!’” (sound of chair breaking). Dave the Long-Winded (DTLW) responded: Read the rest of this entry »